Skip to content

YouTube Everywhere — Who Gets to Monetize?

March 13, 2008

vcmike

Yesterday I wondered whether YouTube was going to permit publishers using its API to monetize the video themselves, or whether YouTube would control that inventory. TechCrunch wondered the same thing.

YouTube exec Hunter Walk offered a sorta answer in a comment to my post. But product manager Jim Paterson offered TechCrunch the direct answer: No.

Here is what he said:

We are not introducing any fundamentally new way to monetize. Any video that is uploaded through our API is treated exactly as on YouTube.com. In general if a video is uploaded to YouTube, in some cases we serve ads into that on YouTube.com. When people embed those we reserve rights to serve ads in the future.

It is not a white-label service. We do offer a hosting service, but it is not a direct alternative to the companies that you mention. There are some big differences. It is a YouTube-branded experience. It is free. The price you pay for using it is you must participate in the YouTube community.

I guess it is only fair to offer the tool for free in exchange for keeping the ad inventory. But I wonder whether it wouldn’t make sense to offer the publisher a share of the ad revenue, at least for the video that is viewed on the publisher’s site…

One Comment

Post a comment
  1. vjerka likes undies #
    July 14, 2009

    Who said it is? Umm. You are curious about whether it wouldn’t make sense to offer the publisher a share of the ad revenue at least for the video that is viewed on the publisher’s site….

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s